ÐHwww.dakotavoice.com/2007/02/natural-family-planning-more-effective.htmlC:/Documents and Settings/Bob Ellis/My Documents/Websites/Dakota Voice Blog 20081230/www.dakotavoice.com/2007/02/natural-family-planning-more-effective.htmldelayedwww.dakotavoice.com/\sck.umpxN2\Iÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿȸ¯‘ ROKtext/htmlUTF-8gzipÀ¹àRÿÿÿÿJ}/yWed, 31 Dec 2008 22:49:25 GMT"a5db0704-bddd-435c-94b8-20d6f86f7df6"v€Mozilla/4.5 (compatible; HTTrack 3.0x; Windows 98)en, en, *K2\IÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿËkR Dakota Voice: Natural Family Planning More Effective than the Pill?

Featured Article

The Gods of Liberalism Revisited

 

The lie hasn't changed, and we still fall for it as easily as ever.  But how can we escape the snare?

 

READ ABOUT IT...

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

Natural Family Planning More Effective than the Pill?

Could it be? From Lifesite.net:

The study involving 900 women was published in the journal, Human Reproduction, and found that the correct use of STM to delay pregnancy led to a rate of 0.4 pregnancies per 100 women per year. The lowest pregnancy rate was found among women who abstained from sex during their most fertile period identified through STM.

In contrast, women who used a barrier method, such as a condom, had a pregnancy rate of .6 pregnancies per 100 women per year. Women who had sex (without contraception) during the fertile period had a pregnancy rate of only 7.5 pregnancies per 100 women per year, however researchers noted that this was a quarter of the rate one would usually expect.


Very interesting. Though I doubt the sexual anarchists will have much use for it. After all, it requires people to exercise sexual restraint--one of the most oppressive concepts in the modern world.


0 comments:

 
Clicky Web Analytics