ÐHwww.dakotavoice.com/2007/03/now-we-have-spousal-unions.htmlC:/Documents and Settings/Bob Ellis/My Documents/Websites/Dakota Voice Blog 20081230/www.dakotavoice.com/2007/03/now-we-have-spousal-unions.htmldelayedwww.dakotavoice.com/\sck.u8mx¦-\Iÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿȸ¯‘ îNOKtext/htmlUTF-8gzip (àîNÿÿÿÿJ}/yWed, 31 Dec 2008 22:49:25 GMT"a5db0704-bddd-435c-94b8-20d6f86f7df6"ˆ~Mozilla/4.5 (compatible; HTTrack 3.0x; Windows 98)en, en, *¡-\Iÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ7lîN Dakota Voice: Now We Have "Spousal Unions"

Featured Article

The Gods of Liberalism Revisited

 

The lie hasn't changed, and we still fall for it as easily as ever.  But how can we escape the snare?

 

READ ABOUT IT...

Tuesday, March 06, 2007

Now We Have "Spousal Unions"


This is why last year's South Dakota Amendment C (marriage protection amendment) used the term "quasi marital" in banning all forms of same-sex unions. Proponents of the measure knew homosexual activists would continue to coin new terms to try and skirt prohibitions on legal recognition of homosexual unions.

From the Concord Monitor (hat tip to the Institute for Marriage and Public Policy):

In addition to Baxley's bill, which would create full-fledged same-sex marriage, lawmakers will debate a Vermont-style civil unions proposal. Rep. Steve Vaillancourt, a Manchester Republican, proposed that bill, which would give same-sex couples the same legal rights as married couples. Splaine considers spousal unions to be somewhere between civil unions and same-sex marriage, since 'we would be terming our partners as spouses.'


0 comments:

 
Clicky Web Analytics