GUEST COLUMN
BY BOBBY SCHINDLER
I sat in confusion last Thursday evening while watching the GOP Presidential debate. All but one of the candidates proudly expressed their pro-life positions, and then just a short time later, in response to a question on the Terri Schiavo case, some of them stated that the courts should decide whether or not it was acceptable for an innocent disabled woman to be starved and dehydrated to death.
Wait a second, wasn't it the courts that made it legal to kill unborn children? How can one be against the courts permitting the deliberate killing of the unborn, but find it perfectly okay for the courts to purposely starve and dehydrate an innocent disabled woman to death? (Full Story)
Featured Article
Wednesday, May 09, 2007
Since When Does Pro-Life Mean Killing the Disabled?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment