ÐHwww.dakotavoice.com/2007/06/bushs-fiscal-restraint-how-politicians.htmlC:/Documents and Settings/Bob Ellis/My Documents/Websites/Dakota Voice Blog 20081230/www.dakotavoice.com/2007/06/bushs-fiscal-restraint-how-politicians.htmldelayedwww.dakotavoice.com/\sck.qruxÒ \IÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÈ@¼ ùUOKtext/htmlUTF-8gzipÀ¹àùUÿÿÿÿJ}/yWed, 31 Dec 2008 22:49:25 GMT"a5db0704-bddd-435c-94b8-20d6f86f7df6"$pMozilla/4.5 (compatible; HTTrack 3.0x; Windows 98)en, en, *Ð \IÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿmùU Dakota Voice: Bush's 'Fiscal Restraint' - How Politicians Think

Featured Article

The Gods of Liberalism Revisited

 

The lie hasn't changed, and we still fall for it as easily as ever.  But how can we escape the snare?

 

READ ABOUT IT...

Monday, June 18, 2007

Bush's 'Fiscal Restraint' - How Politicians Think

By Paul E. Scates

The headline was enough to make any American taxpayer stand up and cheer – “Bush Threatens Veto of Runaway Congressional Spending.”

But wait a minute...who is this “Bush” who’s making such a promise? If it’s our president, we need to recall that during the past ten years, while the Republican Party has controlled Congress, he didn’t veto even one appropriations bill. Even the most expensive public works legislation in history, the $286.4 BILLION highway appropriations bill of 2005, which contained over $24 BILLION in earmarks – i.e., pet projects selected by virtually every senator and representative to gain favor with voters by providing federal funds in the form of construction projects and jobs, and added just prior to the final votes so nobody has the opportunity to question or oppose these expenditures. (Full Story)


1 comments:

Anonymous said...

I don't agree with you on the snowmobile trail. At least the snowmobiles used gas and paid for the project from the gas tax they paid on the fuel they used. Since they aren't used on the highways they aren't damaging them so why shouldn't the taxes they pay be used on the trails they use?

 
Clicky Web Analytics