By John W. Whitehead
When I was a boy, like most children,
I was into everything and everybody’s business.
Full of mischief, I was constantly getting into scrapes. All I had to do was
walk out the door and trouble found me—or vice versa. But I never got away with
anything because inevitably, by the time I arrived back home, my parents had
already been alerted by the neighbors to my goings-on and were waiting to light
into me.
Although that didn’t stop me from doing stupid things, I learned pretty quickly
that I was part of a community that was watching out for each other. Even when I
got in trouble, it felt good knowing there were people who cared enough to hold
me accountable. They taught me values and social responsibility, and they helped
me understand that I was never alone.
Yet except for the times when tragedy draws us together, as it did in the weeks
following the 9/11 attacks and as it has done now in the days following the
latest school shooting, we have largely lost that sense of community that once
gave meaning and shape to our lives.
This brings us to the events of April 16, 2007, when a 23-year-old Asian student
walked into a university building on the Virginia Tech campus, chained the doors
shut and opened fire on students and teachers alike, leaving 32 dead and many
more injured before turning the gun on himself.
The media, true to form, is subjecting us to every grisly detail of the
shootings. You can’t turn on the television without seeing this tragedy used as
grist for prime-time ratings. In its feeding frenzy, the media has succeeded in
glamorizing death and destruction to such an extent that shooting sprees have
gained a notorious appeal—a way for people who, in life, may never have rated a
second glance to attain celebrity status in death.
Yet even with the 24-hour coverage, we have more questions than answers, and
speculation is rife. And the biggest question of all looms large: who or what is
to blame?
Sociologists want to blame it on the steady diet of violence that permeates
everything in our culture. We have been caught in the grip of a cycle of
violence that started with the government’s televised attack on a Waco compound
in April 1993, in which 79 adults and children were killed. Two years later, to
the day, the Oklahoma City bombing left 168 people dead. Four years after that,
on April 20, two teenagers, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, opened fire on
classmates and teachers at Columbine High School, killing 12 students and one
teacher and leaving 24 others wounded. Now, on April 16, we have the Virginia
Tech massacre.
Politicians want to blame the tragedy on easy access to guns. Their solution?
Gun control and zero tolerance policies. But these are just cosmetic band-aids,
doomed to failure, because if someone really wants to wreak havoc, they’ll find
a way to obtain a weapon.
In the end, however, there is no simple answer to why this happened and no
straightforward solution for preventing it from happening again. Yet if we want
to get to the heart of the problem, we have to look to our young people for
clues.
Over the years, I’ve spent a lot of time talking to young people, and what I’m
hearing is that they feel helpless, hopeless and lost. They feel that their
lives are lacking in meaning and direction. Tuned into their IPODS, the Internet
and TV, they have tuned out to the rest of the world. Lacking real communities
that provide accountability, values and spirituality, they have found
substitutes in cyber communities like MySpace and Friendster.
America’s youth have witnessed our self-destructive path, and they bear the
scars. In the world in which they are coming of age, human life is not precious.
Unborn babies can be terminated at will. God is relegated to church and the
privacy of one’s home. Divorce is the number one destroyer of families.
Corruption is rampant—not only in government and business but even in religious
circles. And we have become so insulated from one another that a wave from a
stranger can seem almost threatening.
No wonder life seems so meaningless to so many. So what can we do?
Dr. James P. Comer, professor of psychiatry at Yale University’s Child Study
Center, suggests that in order to treat the damage done to the next generation,
“We’re going to have to work at systematically recreating the critical elements
of community that once existed naturally. We can’t go back to the past, but
there was a time when people cared about each other and would look out for each
other.”
If we are to get anything out of this wrenching ordeal, let us remember what it
means to be part of a community that respects and values each member. It
certainly couldn’t hurt to start being kinder to one another and reaching out to
our neighbors. In that way, maybe we can begin to rebuild the sense of community
this country so desperately needs.
John W.
Whitehead is an attorney and author who has written, debated and practiced
widely in the area of constitutional law and human rights. Whitehead's
concern for the persecuted and oppressed led him, in 1982, to establish The
Rutherford Institute, a nonprofit civil liberties and human rights
organization whose international headquarters are located in
Charlottesville, Virginia. Whitehead serves as the Institute’s president and
spokesperson.
|