One can’t help but
wonder if perhaps the mainstream media is feeling a growing sense of
uneasiness regarding Terri’s death.
In the two years
since my sister died I have witnessed an increasing determination on
their part to convince the public that she was “hopeless” and in a
persistent vegetative state (PVS) regardless of any and all evidence to
the contrary.
I believe this is
happening because of the increasing number of questions now being raised
as to the veracity of the PVS diagnosis, which was the litmus test used
to kill Terri – a litmus test which is still being used to justify the
killing of others who are said to be in this condition.
Just last month
researchers found that over 40% of the people diagnosed as being in a
PVS are, in fact, misdiagnosed. This new study confirmed an already
existing British study regarding the high rate of PVS misdiagnoses.
In addition to
this, scientists are developing new technology that takes better images
of brain function. Much to the surprise of researchers some of these
images taken on persons that were thought to be oblivious to their
surroundings show that they have some level of consciousness.
There have also
been a growing number of persons diagnosed as being in “vegetative”
conditions, predicted by doctors to never to regain consciousness, who
have unexplainably awakened.
A number of these
patients regained awareness after being in a “PVS” or similar conditions
far longer than Terri was – Terry Wallis regained awareness after 19
years, Sarah Scantlin after 20 years, and Patricia White Bull after 16
years.
And then you have
recent stories like that of 36 year-old Jesse Ramirez, whose feeding
tube was removed by his wife only ten days after he suffered a severe
head trauma in an automobile accident, when doctors said that he would
most likely end up “vegetative.”
Fortunately his
parents questioned the doctors, found an attorney and were able to get a
judge to have his feeding tube reinserted. Days later Jesse began to
make noticeable improvement and is now interacting with family and
friends and scheduled for rehab.
Haleigh Poutre’s
story is disturbingly similar. Doctors gave her a “no hope for recovery”
diagnosis and recommended that Haleigh’s feeding be stopped so that she
would die, only to be proven wrong when she started to improve.
One can only guess
how often persons like Jesse, and Haleigh die without someone there
actively advocating for their lives.
Moreover, what’s
common to all these stories is the fact that the mainstream media
reports them, not solely on their merits, but with the oft-repeated,
almost frantic disclaimer that “of course this should not be confused
with Terri Schiavo’s case.”
In an ABC News
just a couple of weeks ago regarding Jesse Ramirez, they made certain to
separate his situation from Terri’s. “But ethicists debate the extent to
which this comparison is valid. This guy was not hopeless and in a
persistent vegetative state by any means.”
Here is a USA
Today story from June 2005. “The cases of Wallis and Schiavo are
different biologically. Both slipped into comas when their brains were
first injured, but then they diverged. Schiavo remained vegetative while
Wallis moved into a state of limbo.”
And a Washington
Post article from September 2006. “But Owen, Schiff and others stressed
that the research does not indicate that many patients in vegetative
states are necessarily aware or likely to recover. Schiavo, in
particular, had suffered much more massive brain damage for far longer
than the patient in Britain, making awareness or recovery impossible,
they said.”
One has to wonder
why the media goes to such extravagant lengths to distance Terri’s case
from anything and everything that might connect her to a positive
development or outcome.
Perhaps it is
because they realize just how culpable they are in her death. Rather
than report the facts of her case, the media championed the cause of the
so-called “right to die” movement. They wrote Terri off as “hopeless”
from the beginning and never bothered to examine the reality of her
situation.
By trumpeting the
decision of the judge who sentenced her to die, handling with kid gloves
the “husband” who sought to kill her and giving a platform to euthanasia
advocates, the media abdicated all responsibility to present the truth
to the American public.
In situations like
my sister’s, where a life was at stake, one would think that if even one
doctor with proper credentials did not agree with the PVS diagnoses,
common sense would dictate that the judge would err on the side of life.
What if, as in
Terri’s case, there were 40 doctors who disagreed with the diagnosis?
Remember, the
decision was left up to Judge George Greer who determined Terri was in a
PVS despite hearing testimony from more physicians that physically
examined Terri and believed that she was not in PVS than those who
thought she was.
In addition to
this there were more than 30 doctors that submitted affidavits to Greer
corroborating with the doctors that said Terri either was not in PVS, or
should have been given better testing in order to determine her actual
condition, not to mention the videos of Terri that unmistakably
contradict the PVS diagnosis.
And let’s not
forget the autopsy which did NOT prove that Terri was PVS. The fact of
matter is that the media – incredibly – continues to distort the autopsy
with the public believing, all the while, that it confirmed Terri was in
PVS.
Dr. Thogmartin,
who performed Terri’s autopsy clearly stated, on at least three separate
occasions, that he was unable to conclude whether Terri was in a PVS
because it is a clinical diagnosis (person must be alive) and cannot be
confirmed by autopsy.
Even more
significant was the statement of Dr. Thogmartin’s colleague,
neuropathologist Dr. Stephen Nelson, who said he could not rule out that
Terri may even have been in a minimally conscious state (MCS) which is a
higher level of consciousness than PVS.
However, even
though all recent findings substantiate the already existing evidence
that Terri was not in a PVS, Greer’s decision and that of the doctors
with whom he sided will never be challenged. This is because no one can
admit that a mistake was made and an innocent, conscious, disabled woman
was wrongly dehydrated to death.
Sadly, the death
movement has many years and millions of dollars invested in manipulating
our culture and wooing the media into accepting this “quality-of-life”
standard that uses the “PVS” diagnosis as a reason to terminate life.
Consequently,
admitting Terri was conscious would be potentially devastating to their
cause. They cannot and will not allow this to happen – thus the constant
repetition that no matter how obvious the evidence may be to the
contrary “we should not confuse” any of these findings “with the Terri
Schiavo case.”
In fact, I expect
it to get worse and for the media to become even more resolute in trying
to justify Terri’s death, regardless that with each passing day it is
becoming clearer that not only was Terri’s condition misdiagnosed, but
that the PVS finding is a sham and should be completely abolished.
Bobby Schindler
is the brother of Terri Schiavo. He and his family now work for the
Terri Schindler Schiavo Foundation in St. Petersburg, Fla., an
organization dedicated to promoting the Culture of Life, embracing the
true meaning of compassion by opposing the practice of euthanasia.
Leave a
comment about this article