WorldNetDaily reports on the gathering of more than 100 scientists at the 2008 International Conference on Climate Change.
Environmental scientist S. Fred Singer and others gathered to shatter Al Gore's myth that humanity is causing global warming.
At the meeting, Singer presented a 40-page report on a study conducted over the past three years by the Nongovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The findings of the study are reflected in the title of the report: "Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate." A full copy of the report can be found at the Heartland Institute.
The report accepts that warming has occurred, but asks the all-important question: "How much is due to anthropogenic causes?" It points out that evidence of warming is not evidence that warming is man-caused. It also points out that the IPCC’s "hockey-stick" temperature analysis, widely cited as "proof" of man-made global warming, has been discredited. Also cited are warming and cooling trends which have occurred over the past 1,000 years.
Projections by computer models have also failed to hold up in the real world.
Ironically, the report says any modest warming is likely to produce positive economic benefits, not the disaster predicted by Al Gore.
The final word:
"Global warming is attributable to natural causes," Singer told WND, "so in that sense global warming is unstoppable, regardless what measures Al Gore or the U.N. want to impose on us with new international governmental regulations."
We should always be wary when business-loathing, Western-culture-hating environmental-extremist socialists come to us crying "The sky is falling."
Even a broken clock is right twice a day, but any "evidence" they present should be examined with a wary eye and their motives in mind.
6 comments:
Regarding your recent piece entitled "Scientist Gathering Challenges Gore 'Science,' I think you neglected to mention an important component.
The scientist in question, S. Fred Singer has a long history of inovlement with the oil industry as well as working for a variety of organizations that have received substantial oil company grants. This is in addition to his frequent work with Hearland Institue, a far right organization.
My point is without acknowledging an agenda,and positioning opinion as fact, you are doing a disservice to your readers. Regardless of the fact that pratically every leading environmental scientist in the world aknowledges mans influence on climate crisis, you are perpetuating falsehoods for your own benefit. Right or Left is irrelevant...what matters is the truth and I would expect your readers feel the same.
Thank you.
Mr. Vance, you left out two important components in your comment. Most scientists who endorse the theory of man-made climate change are not experts in that particular field and those that are are often recipients of enormous grants from Big Government and powerful environmental [sic] special interests groups.
Here are a couple of comments from bona fide experts:
“It is the greatest scam in history. I am amazed, appalled and highly offended by it. Global Warming; It is a SCAM. Some dastardly scientists with environmental and political motives manipulated long term scientific data to create in [sic] allusion of rapid global warming. Other scientists of the same environmental whacko type jumped into the circle to support and broaden the "research" to further enhance the totally slanted, bogus global warming claims. Their friends in government steered huge research grants their way to keep the movement going. Soon they claimed to be a consensus.” --John Coleman, Meteorologist and the founder of the cable TV Weather Channel
"They've been brainwashing us for 20 years, starting with the nuclear winter and now with the global warming. This scare will also run its course. In 15-20 years, we'll look back and see what a hoax this was." –Climatologist Dr. William Gray and the world’s most famous hurricane expert.
Yes, Booth, every scientist is on board with Al Gore...except for the thousands who aren't. Check EarthTimes.org or the Oregon Petition. Or you can click the "global warming" label on this site and read about the fraction of the multitude of scientists and reports which throw cold water on the global warming theory.
But I'm sure they're all in the pocket of Big Oil, too, and tied to Right Wing groups, right?
Like Al Gore isn't making a haul on his carbon credit schemes, and isn't tied to plenty of Leftist socialist groups? Like his anti-business and anti-Western bias might not be a clue to where his loyalties lie?
But regardless of political affiliations, take a look at the science, and maybe even throw in a dash of common sense. Not only does the science simply not support Gore's contention, evidence that any warming has natural causes is overwhelming. It defies reason to believe cars are warming the planet but the star in the middle of our solar system couldn't have anything to do with it. There is also evidence of cyclic warming and cooling over the centuries...but of course because Al Gore says so, THIS TIME it's caused by evil Western businesses.
Don't believe this flimsy whimsy pablum the "mainstream" media feeds you.
If your arguments are as strong as you believe then they should stand up to scrutiny from "the other side":
http://www.realclimate.org/
and
http://gristmill.grist.org/skeptics
Take your arguments there.
Specifically, the "consensus" about anthropogenic climate change entails the following:
1) the climate is undergoing a pronounced warming trend beyond the range of natural variability;
2) the major cause of most of the observed warming is rising levels of the greenhouse gas CO2;
3) the rise in CO2 is the result of burning fossil fuels;
4) if CO2 continues to rise over the next century, the warming will continue; and
5) a climate change of the projected magnitude over this time frame represents potential danger to human welfare and the environment.
These conclusions have been explicitly endorsed by:
Academia Brasiliera de Ciências (Bazil)
Royal Society of Canada
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Academié des Sciences (France)
Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina (Germany)
Indian National Science Academy
Accademia dei Lincei (Italy)
Science Council of Japan
Russian Academy of Sciences
Royal Society (United Kingdom)
National Academy of Sciences (United States of America)
Australian Academy of Sciences
Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium for Sciences and the Arts
Caribbean Academy of Sciences
Indonesian Academy of Sciences
Royal Irish Academy
Academy of Sciences Malaysia
Academy Council of the Royal Society of New Zealand
Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
In addition to these national academies, the following institutions specializing in climate, atmosphere, ocean, and/or earth sciences have endorsed these conclusions:
NASA's Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
National Academy of Sciences (NAS)
State of the Canadian Cryosphere (SOCC)
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Royal Society of the United Kingdom (RS)
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
American Institute of Physics (AIP)
National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR)
American Meteorological Society (AMS)
Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society (CMOS)
These organizations also agree with the consensus:
The Earth Institute at Columbia University
Northwestern University
University of Akureyri
University of Iceland
Iceland GeoSurvey
National Centre for Atmospheric Science UK
Climate Group
Climate Institute
Climate Trust
Wuppertal Institute for Climate Environment and Energy
Royal Meteorological Society
Community Research and Development Centre Nigeria
Geological Society of London
Geological Society of America
UK Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment
Pew Center on Global Climate Change
American Association for the Advancement of Science
National Research Council
Juelich Research Centre
US White House
US Council on Environmental Quality
US Office of Science Technology Policy
US National Climatic Data Center
US Department of Commerce
US National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service
The National Academy of Engineering
The Institute of Medicine
UK Natural Environment Research Council
Office of Science and Technology Policy
Council on Environmental Quality
National Economic Council
Office of Management and Budget
The National Academy of Engineering
The Institute of Medicine
UK Natural Environment Research Council
Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology
Engineers Australia
American Chemical Society
American Association of Blacks in Energy
World Petroleum Council
The Weather Channel
National Geographic
The following companies agree with the consensus:
ABB
Air France
Alcan
Alcoa
Allian
American Electric Power
Aristeia Capital
BASF
Bayer
BP America Inc.
Calvert Group
Canadian Electricity Association
Caterpilliar Inc.
Centrica
Ceres
Chevron
China Renewable
Citigroup
ConocoPhillips
Covanta Holding Corporation
Deutsche Telekom
Doosan Babcock Energy Limited
Duke Energy
DuPont
EcoSecurities
Electricity de France North America
Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
Endesa
Energettech Austraila Pty Ltd
Energy East Corporation
Energy Holding Romania
Energy Industry Association
Eni
Eskorn
ETG International
Exelon Corporation
ExxonMobil
F&C Asset Management
FPL Group
General Electric
German Electricity Association
Glitnir Bank
Global Energy Network Institute, Iberdrola
ING Group
Institute for Global Environmental Strategies
Interface Inc.
International Gas Union
International Paper
International Power
Marsh & McLennan Companies
Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company
MEDIAS-France
MissionPoint Capital Partners
Munich Re
National Grid
National Power Company of Iceland
NGEN mgt II, LLC
NiSource
NRG Energy
PG&E Corporation
PNM Resources
Reykjavik Energy
Ricoh
Rio Tinto Energy Services
Rockefeller Brothers Fund
Rolls-Royce
Societe Generale de Surveillance (SGS Group)
Stora Enso North America
Stratus Consulting
Sun Management Institute
Swiss Re
UCG Partnership
US Geothermal
Verde Venture Partners
Volvo
In addition, the scientific consensus is also endorsed by the CEO's of the following companies:
A. O. Smith Corporation
Abbott Laboratories
Accenture Ltd.
ACE Limited
ADP
Aetna Inc.
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
AK Steel Corporation
Alcatel-Lucent
Allstate Insurance Company
ALLTEL Corporation
Altec Industries, Inc.
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
American Express Company
American International Group, Inc.
Ameriprise Financial
AMR Corporation/American Airlines
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation
Apache Corporation
Applera Corporation
Arch Coal, Inc.
Archer Daniels Midland Company
ArvinMeritor, Inc.
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
Avery Dennison Corporation
Avis Budget Group, Inc.
Bechtel Group, Inc.
BNSF Railway
Boeing Company
Brink's Company
CA
Carlson Companies, Inc.
Case New Holland Inc.
Ceridian Corporation
Chemtura Corporation
Chubb Corporation
CIGNA Corporation
Coca-Cola Company
Constellation Energy Group, Inc.
Convergys Corporation
Con-way Incorporated
Corning Incorporated
Crane Co.
CSX Corporation
Cummins Inc.
Deere & Company
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Delphi Corporation
Dow Chemical Company
Eastman Chemical Company
Eastman Kodak Company
Eaton Corporation
EDS
Eli Lilly and Company
EMC Corporation
Ernst & Young, L.L.P.
Fannie Mae
FedEx Corporation
Fluor Corporation
FMC Corporation
Freddie Mac
General Mills, Inc.
General Motors Corporation
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
Goodrich Corporation
Harman International Industries, Inc.
Hartford Financial Services Group
Home Depot, Inc., The
Honeywell International, Inc.
HSBC - North America
Humana Inc.
IBM Corporation
Ingersoll-Rand Company
International Textile Group
ITT Corporation
Johnson Controls, Inc.
JP Morgan Chase & Co.
KPMG LLP
Liberty Mutual Group
MassMutual
MasterCard Incorporated
McGraw-Hill Companies
McKesson Corporation
MeadWestvaco Corporation
Medco Health Solutions, Inc.
Merck & Co., Inc.
Merrill Lynch & Company, Inc.
MetLife, Inc.
Morgan Stanley
Motorola, Inc.
Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
National Gypsum Company
Nationwide
Navistar International Corporation
New York Life Insurance Company
Norfolk Southern Corporation
Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company
Nucor Corporation
NYSE Group, Inc.
Office Depot, Inc.
Owens Corning (Reorganized) Inc.
Pactiv Corporation
Peabody Energy Corporation
Pfizer Inc
PPG Industries, Inc.
Praxair, Inc.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Principal Financial Group
Procter & Gamble Company
Prudential Financial
Realogy Corporation
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
Ryder System, Inc.
SAP America, Inc.
Sara Lee Corporation
SAS Institute Inc.
Schering-Plough Corporation
Schneider National, Inc.
ServiceMaster Company
Siemens Corporation
Southern Company
Springs Global US, Inc.
Sprint Nextel
St. Paul Travelers Companies, Inc.
State Farm Insurance Companies
Tenneco
Texas Instruments Incorporated
Textron Incorporated
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
TIAA-CREF
Tyco Electronics
Tyco International Ltd.
Union Pacific Corporation
Unisys Corporation
United Technologies Corporation
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
USG Corporation
Verizon Communications
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
Western & Southern Financial Group
Weyerhaeuser Company
Whirlpool Corporation
Williams Companies, Inc.
Xerox Corporation
YRC Worldwide Inc
I'll take this "consensus" over Fred Singer and the "scientists" cherry picked for his conference.
I'll ask you again, brewski, to examine the science behind the contention of anthropogenic global warming, which is sorely lacking. Even a majority doesn't determine what's right, only what's popularly accepted.
If you're keen on what's popularly accepted, we could go back to Hitler's Germany where killing Jews was popular. Or when bleeding the sick to "cure" them was popular. Or when some thought the sun orbited the earth.
Following the herd instinct can be comforting...until reality slaps us in the face.
Don't forget to check out the list of thousands of scientists at the Oregon Petition who DON'T buy this myth.
Post a Comment