by Carrie K. Hutchens
If Hillary Clinton wins (or doesn't lose too badly) either Ohio or Texas, then suddenly the voters--as a whole--have made a statement that all prior votes not for Hillary were a mistake and a message for her to continue? And Ohio and Texas began speaking for the rest of the states and voters when?
This seems to be the setup-assumption going into the next round of primaries, that somehow victories in these states will set aright Hillary's manifest destiny.
Hillary was apparently really excited about winning Missouri, a state she called important, until she found out she hadn't actually won it. Suddenly it wasn't really important. Is any state she loses?
There is something that Hillary and her gang aren't considering...
The primary is only the beginning. There is this thing called the "General Election" that follows. So, here she disrespects the voters and her own party and then thinks she is a shoe-in, simply because she wants the nomination and can play dirty enough to fool enough of the people for at least long enough to get her foot in the door? Doesn't she get the "idea" that there might just be enough people that don't want "HER" specifically that they will vote Republican to keep her out of the White House?
I don't think she's even considered that possibility.
Hillary Clinton doesn't seem to see beyond herself far enough to get a true grasp on the "people opinion". She just goes on about her merry way and acts like people are suppose to approve of her and what she does--even if what she does is clearly unacceptable.
It's okay for Hillary and Bill Clinton to distort the facts, and we are to just accept it as the norm of politics? I think not!
The lies and the distortions need to stop. There is no reason that this is a legitimate part of politics. It is merely something that people once got by with and we began to accept as just the way it is (was). Well, maybe it was the way it was, but it is not a rule or some pattern that must be followed. We give it life or we stop it in its tracks. And the time for it to stop is now.
If Hillary Clinton can lose and lose and lose and lose...only to have Ohio and Texas change her loss into a an overall "win," I think we better go back and do a reconsideration on exactly what the voting process is all about.
No vote truly matters until the "predetermined" candidate gets the winning votes? Only then does a vote matter? That's a pretty scary thought, when the will of the people suddenly become the non-issue and someone else is calling all the shots!
Carrie Hutchens is a former law enforcement officer and a freelance writer who is active in fighting against the death culture movement and the injustices within the judicial and law enforcement systems.
Featured Article
Tuesday, March 04, 2008
When is a Clinton Loss a Loss?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
YOU MIGHT BE AN IDIOT:-)
If you think Barack Obama with little or no experience would be better than Hillary Clinton with 35 years experience.
You Might Be An Idiot!
If you think that Obama with no experience can fix an economy on the verge of collapse better than Hillary Clinton. Whose ;-) husband (Bill Clinton) led the greatest economic expansion, and prosperity in American history.
You Might Be An Idiot!
If you think that Obama with no experience fighting for universal health care can get it for you better than Hillary Clinton. Who anticipated this current health care crisis back in 1993, and fought a pitched battle against overwhelming odds to get universal health care for all the American people.
You Might Be An Idiot!
If you think that Obama with no experience can manage, and get us out of two wars better than Hillary Clinton. Whose ;-) husband (Bill Clinton) went to war only when he was convinced that he absolutely had to. Then completed the mission in record time against a nuclear power. AND DID NOT LOSE THE LIFE OF A SINGLE AMERICAN SOLDIER. NOT ONE!
You Might Be An Idiot!
If you think that Obama with no experience saving the environment is better than Hillary Clinton. Whose ;-) husband (Bill Clinton) left office with the greatest amount of environmental cleanup, and protections in American history.
You Might Be An Idiot!
If you think that Obama with little or no education experience is better than Hillary Clinton. Whose ;-) husband (Bill Clinton) made higher education affordable for every American. And created higher job demand and starting salary's than they had ever been before or since.
You Might Be An Idiot!
If you think that Obama with no experience will be better than Hillary Clinton who spent 8 years at the right hand of President Bill Clinton. Who is already on record as one of the greatest Presidents in American history.
You Might Be An Idiot!
If you think that you can change the way Washington works with pretty speeches from Obama, rather than with the experience, and political expertise of two master politicians ON YOUR SIDE like Hillary and Bill Clinton..
You Might Be An Idiot!
If you think all those Republicans voting for Obama in the Democratic primaries, and caucuses are doing so because they think he is a stronger Democratic candidate than Hillary Clinton. :-)
Best regards
jacksmith...
Oh... now I get it! We're actually voting for Bill Clinton! We're actually voting based upon HIS record and HIS accomplishments in the past 35 years! Well, I was wondering, until you made it quite clear, since no one can seem to give a list of impressive things that SHE -- not Bill -- accomplished during that mysterious 35 year claim! Thank you for clarifying that for me! A vote for Hillary is actually a vote for Bill! Who would have thought that, if Jack hadn't explained it to us idiots, who thought she was the one actually running for President?
Post a Comment