by Carrie K. Hutchens
I woke up to a clip of Bill Clinton blaming the media for what he considers unjust coverage of Hillary's "misstatement" of the 1995 Bosnia trip. Poor Hillary, it was late at night, he claims. Besides the fact that the trip was in 1996, rather than 1995, he had some other facts wrong, too.
Hillary made the sniper fire statement on more than one occasion, contrary to his claim of once and at 11 at night when she was supposedly tired. But, of course, it wasn't his fault he brought it up again, or that Hillary lied in the first place -- it was all the fault of the media.
Speaking of confusing the facts when it is late at night -- if Hillary gets that confused at 11 PM, just how confused is she going to be at 3 AM when that phone rings?
Then we have Bill, who apparently can't get things right in the light of day, yet he has no hesitation blaming the media for worrying about it or reporting it. How dare they? That's unfair coverage according to Clinton it would seem.
The Clintons also suggest that Hillary was the only first lady since Eleanor Roosevelt to visit a combat zone. Guess Pat Nixon and Barbara Bush don't count. Maybe the Clintons meant to say the only "Democrat" first lady and it just "slipped their minds" to add that little added description.
Bill did give me an additional chuckle. He suggests when others get to be 60 (which Hillary is) that they might forget something when they are tired at 11 P.M., too. Is he saying, that at 60, people start getting to be feeble-minded and we should over-look their forgetfulness on major issues -- like being shot at? Yep, I want a feeble-minded president that confuses smiles, hand shakes, welcomes and a little girl's poem with sniper fire and need to duck and run immediately to waiting vehicles.
Did I mention that if Hillary gets THAT confused at 11 PM, we might have concern about a 3 AM call? Oh well... never mind, I'm sure if she gets too confused, it will be the media's fault and she can always go talk to Jay Leno about it.
Carrie Hutchens is a former law enforcement officer and a freelance writer who is active in fighting against the death culture movement and the injustices within the judicial and law enforcement systems.
3 comments:
Well, you know it is only fair. Hillary covered for his lies and obfuscations for years and now Bill has to reciprocate.
They are a perfect couple: She has had to endure the humiliation of Bill's philandering, and Bill has had to endure the humiliation of Hillary's indifference.
Why does the country continue to take them seriously? How much more do we info do we need...Monica to a missing files, corruption, pardons for relatives involved in bad business deals...right down to simple lies about Bosnia and the poor woman in the hospital that died. If she cared at all she would have looked into the story to get her facts straight, but she doesn't care. She assumes she will get what she wants, the presidency. Why does a person with a history of corruption and lying continue to get the credit she does without Ever having to really fully answer to her dealings?
First, Hillary sees imaginary sniper fire.
Then, she says she "misspoke" but others are "elitists."
Now, she tells us she hunted at as a girl.
Seems like every time she opens her mouth these days, some kind of weapon comes out.
Post a Comment