Politicians, especially during campaign season, always try to put on their best face, so it can be difficult to ascertain where a candidate really stands and what they really believe.
Barack Obama talks a lot about "hope" and "change," but he's come up a little short in the "tangible idea" department.
Michelle Obama is very good at exposing some of the radical liberal positions held in the Obama household.
First, back in February, she told us that "for the first time in my adult lifetime, I'm really proud of my country." Me? I couldn't count the times as an adult and as a child I've been really proud of my country. Hmmmm.
Now yesterday LifeNews reports that Michelle Obama defended partial birth abortion in a 2004 fundraising letter she wrote for her husband.
"The fact remains, with no provision to protect the heath of the mother, this ban on a legitimate medical procedure is clearly unconstitutional and must be overturned," Michelle Obama writes in the letter.
Legitimate? What possible medical legitimacy could there be for partial birth abortion?
In case you're not familiar with the hideous partial birth abortion procedure, I've included a graphic in this post, and you can find out more here.
The baby is delivered breech, which is not a "healthy" idea under any circumstance, but it is necessary to do what the partial birth abortion provides. You see, the abortionist stops delivering the baby while the head is still inside the mother, then cuts a hole in the back of the baby's head, scrambles the poor child's brain, then finishes delivering the dead baby from its mother's body.
You see, for lack of a few inches, the baby would be fully delivered outside its mother's body...and then it would be a "person." For the lack of those few inches, it has been considered "legal" (and apparently "legitimate" by some) to murder an otherwise healthy, almost-delivered child.
This barbarity is what the Obamas approve of.
1 comments:
The procedure is all that you describe except that after piercing the skull and scrambling the brains a high-powered suction catheter is inserted and the brains are sucked into a jar. It has been reported that during this procedure the baby's arms and legs writhe and jerk in apparent severe pain.
The Obamas claim that they objected to the legislation because of a lack of provision "for the health of the mother." I can say categorically and absolutely that there is no medical indication for such a procedure for any reason except to kill a child that is not wanted. Period. This is nothing short of infanticide and anyone who supports such a heinous, gruesome procedure cannot be a Christian or an American. The US Constitution protects all of us against loss of life and this is a clear violation of that principle.
Learn more here: http://www.jeremiahproject.com/culture/partbirthabortion.html
Post a Comment