From the producers:
Internet advertisement by the Our Country Deserves Better Committee highlighting the fact that the Republican Vice Presidential candidate, Sarah Palin, has MORE executive experience than the Democrat's Presidential candidate, Barack Obama.
We also contrast Palin's impressive experience with the fact that the one supposed attribute of Barack Obama - his "gift" for gab - isn't so impressive after all.
Special thanks to the Hillary Clinton Forum (website: http://www.hillaryclintonforum.net ) for their research assistance, suggestions and passion in the fight against Barack Obama.
10 comments:
wow, how informative.
you didnt mention how sarah palin wanted to take BOOKS out of the library. that's right, BOOKS.
keep talking this smack about barack obama, but in the meantime facts about mccain's lies are skimming the surface.
he criticized barack for wanting kindergarteners to be taught "good touch, bad touch" ?! it is a sick and disturbing fact, but children that young are getting molested. being the daughter of a mother who was molested, i think the education for the kindergarteners to be taught.
mccain also wants 5,000 dollars to each person for healthcare. a knee surgery alone has costed my mother over 12,000 dollars. what about those suffering with cancer or deadly diseases? 5000 is not sufficient.
Erika: You are wrong, Sarah Palin did not try to take books out of a library.
You are simply repeating FALSE smears from the likes of DailyKos and DemocraticUnderground.
Nice try though! Barack in his own words making a fool of himself, and the best you can do is repeat a lie about the eminently qualified Sarah Palin.
You failed!
Thanks, Erika, but it looks like you still need some more information.
Which books did Sarah Palin allegedly want to take out of the library?
The sex ed Obama wants for kindergartners is a little more in depth than "good touch bad touch." How about AIDS education? Since 72% of male AIDS cases in the United States stem from homosexual activity, do you think kindergartners really need AIDS education?
You might be right that $5000 would be a paltry amount to deal with major medical expenses. But with the propaganda you've shared here already, even not knowing what you're talking about, it's a good bet it isn't accurate. Maybe $5000 to buy a policy for someone who doesn't have one, but I doubt it's a chunk of cash intended to pay a medical bill.
Hopefully you're not thinking of voting for the socialist Barack Obama. If you are, you're not just a Koolaid drinker; you've imbibed the whole jug.
The book was called "Daddy's Roommate" and she did indeed ask (3 times) what would happen if she were to request it be removed from the library.
If you honestly think Barack Obama wanted to teach AIDS to young children you're out of your mind. It may have been in the wording but he was voting to help kids recognize inappropriate touching. Do you not think they should be equipped to identify pedophiles?
And the $5000 number is accurate.
The "facts" put forth by the above video are presented in a sickeningly exaggerated way. And if anyone wants to have a debate about Sarah Palin's lack of qualifications, please email me. I welcome it. shanedevon@gmail.com
If inappropriate touching was all Obama wanted to teach kindergartners, then why was the other more aggressive material in the bill? Obvious answer: they wanted it taught to the children.
As for "Daddy's Roommate," that is a disgusting piece of pro-homosexual propaganda intended to ruin the minds of young people, and if she had wanted it removed, I would support her in that.
It's shameful to promote and legitimize homosexuality--an immoral and unhealthy practice--to anyone, let alone children.
It just goes to show the moral bankruptcy of some people that they would even consider it controversial to keep this material from children.
If a parent wanted to show her child a book called "Daddy's Roommate," she would have every right to do so, and you would have no right to stop her.
Tell me something, if that book had instead been a piece of anti-homosexual propaganda titled "Daddy's Perverted, Disease-Spreading, Immoral, God-Hating, Humanity-Defiling Sex Partner," as I'm sure you'd much prefer it be called, would children be MORE or LESS likely to beat up a classmate who has gay parents?
I suppose you'd rather children be completely ignorant to the fact that lots of their peers live in gay households than subject them to a book like this, right? That's what Christians are all about, after all - willful ignorance.
If a parent wanted to show that rot to their child, I suppose they would have the right (though in a saner culture it might have constituted a form of child abuse) today.
However, we're talking about access in a library, regardless of whether the parent approves or not. Many librarians are militantly anti-family and pro-homosexual, so there wouldn't be the slightest hesitation on the part of some librarians to allow young children to look at this book--or even steer young children to it.
It would indeed be better if children didn't have to know about such immoral and unhealthy practices until they were nearing adulthood. In our over-sexualized and morally bankrupt culture, however, maintaining their innocence that long is all but impossible.
However, if and when they must know, it should be done by their parents, with truth about the immorality and health risks of homosexuality--not by a book in a library that normalizes and glamorizes something that is destructive physically and spiritually.
"Many librarians are militantly anti-family and pro-homosexual."
Bob, you have got to stop making me laugh so hard! My coworkers are giving me weird looks. Seriously, where do you come up with these things?!
It's called "opening my eyes." You should try it sometime. These radical tendencies from many librarians is well documented. Of course, you probably wouldn't notice; you'd just accept it as part of the natural (liberal) order.
Barak Hussein's personal and professional character judgements:
William Ayers - American Terrorist
Raila Odinga - Cousin, Radical
Raul Reyes - Columbian Terrorist
Antonio Rezko - Criminal
Reverend Wright
Reverend James Meeks
Reverend Louis Farrakhan
Nadhmi Auchi
Sohaib Abassi
VS
Sarah Palin with mayoral, governing experience, who may or may not suggested banning a library book and, was concerned her brother in law who threatened people with death and used a tazer on his own 11yr old son, as a state trooper may not have been good for the the public's best interest, and not overly concerned about wearing a dated hairstyle.
A close look at who is behind the media holding its tongue would be enlightening.
Post a Comment